Thursday, July 25, 2013

Response to Ty's Late Night Pondering.

Alright, first off I love Bertrand Russell's quote and I love Bertrand Russell. Mainly due to his large contribution to the analytic philosophy and his views on society. Some points about his "Scientific Society" are quite interesting and logical like a one world government through co-operation and population growth regulations, but ultimately it is too ideal (Ironic in a general sense with his involvement with the British "Revolt Against Idealism"). Anyway continuing on...

My Response
It is a true cliche when you say "history repeats itself" (and yes, I love this cliche because it's fucking true) and the mentality of the American people has only slighted shifted into a "close-enough" attitude. Ever since the US ascended from the scorched ashes of WWII and brought the American citizen the "Golden Age" of American history. And what did those tired and sex-deprived GI's do? Banged their wives and mistresses and produced the infamous Baby Boomer generation. Like you previously stated, "think McCathry" the 2nd Red Scare of 1947-1957 socially declared and associated certain people a political ideology that resonated everything you need to know about that person...they are the bad guys. Terrible, but like I previously stated history repeats itself. Going way back to the Fertile Crescent and the Spanish Inquisition, choosing sides has always been the most efficient social/political/and philosophical tool to unite people and change/reform/fight whatever you like to call "affirmative action" to achieve an ultimate goal. Everyone has something to say, but no one, not even you, wants to listen. Obviously, I agree this kind of mentality needs to just go away. I talk to many outspoken political activists at my university and the ones that do not have much to say in discussions and small talks, tend to have the more interesting perspectives. Funny, this makes me think of when our grade school teachers told us not to be shy and raise our hands even if we didn't have the correct answers; WE LEARNED. People today, either in a diverse, intelligent, and free world or a corrupt, third world nation, communication of beliefs and accepting or better yet to assimilate, is difficult. Not because of cultural and communication barriers, it soley falls on parenthood.  What I mean is that we all begin life in our parent's or family's household; our initial beliefs, perspectives, and values begin with the family and once we leave and adventure out into the world do we form our own beliefs and perceptions and expect to pass this on to the only human being that will listen and follow these teachings...these ideas...children. I'm a big Jeffersonian Republican (and I wish the current Republican Party went back and learned a thing or two form, oh I don't know OUR FOUNDING FATHERS), mostly because it emphasized the common peoples' power, farmers over paid workers, rural vs urban, no national banks and powerful central governments. We have ideas-no will listen-for change to happen-people must accept and often compromise their beliefs-only then can we move forward from this "Stagnation Period" of humanity.

I've always believed, ever since Mr. Price's Current Issues class in high school, that our generation had the potential to do some good in the world and abandon this lazy living, or Feel Good Society (coined by George Soros, for which I completely agree on this Feel Good Society theory of his). I still have that awesome wallpaper on my Facebook account that I think perfectly expresses our generation's frustration with the world today. We've seen it on our parent's faces, they work, sleep, and repeat the whole damn thing everyday. This lie, passed down from one generation to another, has ruined out confidence in our individual potential and our trust with others. This routine, should have been corrected by now, considering our current society believes we have made great leaps as a civilization. Sadly, I have come to the conclusion that this trend of name calling and petty bigotry will always remain constant as long as we continue to cling on to absolute rights and wrongs. Not only do we need to become more open-minded to unknown information, we need to analyze, compare our perceptions, and compromise. It's give and take, as simple as that (something both the Dems and the GOP have completely thrown out the window and look...Congress is not doing shit...sorry I mean important shit {Party Polarization=Bad Times}).

So, how do we truly fix this conundrum? Hard to say, besides the fact that it will be a great undertaking. As I stated previously, 1) the way we raise our children needs to change and that begins with us-the future parents. 2) We also need to reform our Education system to become more involved with their student's future and well being and not just sending kids into the world unprepared, which most of us are. 3) A more intelligent citizenry that can compromise and is not intimidated by a government built to be ruled by the people. 4) Stand up against Big Media and tell them to please STFU and stop delivering commentary news and bring back real journalism. 5) Abandon what is clearly fundamental absolutism in discussions. What I really mean to say Ty is that doubt is ok. It is because of these doubts that people cling to absolute answers. Trust me, it's fucking annoying yet also scary. Thus we must accept compromise in most instances of intrigue or basic communication. Not to say that we can't firmly believe something with sure certainty and that we must always compromise, I only meant that we remain open-minded of other ideas and that we think before we speak. I guess a simplistic term is be a better communicator; have reasons and defend them; and debate with the intent of learning not proving whose right or wrong (under most circumstances).


2 comments:

  1. Personally... I can't wait for the point in time where our country stops caring what the founding fathers wanted. They were somewhat ahead of their time in a few areas, in many more areas however... They were racist assholes that rebelled because it was in THEIR best interest.
    That being said, the meat of this reply is going to revolve around my biggest issue with all conservative groups, which is the concept of small government. We get to choose between being ruled by profits (right-wing government) or ruled by government (left-wing.) I would LOVE for humans to be able to live side by side, without some assholes trying to scalp their neighbor for money.
    Society can't go back to caring more about rural as opposed to urban, and we sure as hell can't go back to caring about farmers more than paid professionals, and truth be told.. I don't know why we would want to do that even if we could.
    That being said, limiting bank influence? Yes. Limiting the power of central government? No. The current republican party is a fantastic example of WHY a strong central government is needed. There are states in the union that have voted in politicians that have purposely rigged the system to implode. Slashing education, welfare, etc. Certain states need to be pimp slapped and be FORCED to teach actual science instead of intelligent design (evolution is just an example of things that are "controversial" that really should...just not be) Not because they should be forced to go with the majority, but because intelligent students are the best investment our country can make. Indoctrinated students are the best timebombs we could create, and that's why they're being made.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Farmers are still a crucial element of our society (until were replace all labor with robots)and I don't mean that farmers are important as they were because back then they actually had power and influence. The real critical elements of Republicanism is the return of strong communities. I think makes sense with the rise of our population. A strong, central government would require a large array of agents to "keep tabs" per-say, which I believe a local communities does that job. At the local level of government, corruption is more apparent. Thus I vouch for a more reformed, organized, and stronger communities to enact federal and state policies. Of course, we both agree of getting money out of politics, but I think it should start from the ground up. Local unions, schools, and business owners are the foundation, focusing out efforts here will make it easier to progress up to the state and federal levels. I agree, that the current GOP is filled with idiots/ fundamentalists/ and radical racists, but I feel we the Republican party can return to what the old Democratic party comprised of...hard-working average joe-shmos. It's a somewhat old conversation about how the GOP needs to change gears fast or they will crumble and fall in a conglomerate of burning trash. As much as you and I agree for a strong and reactive central government, it all starts with the average joes. I mean the damn women and temperance reformers of prohibition used the public education system and educated hundreds of kids and that carried on generations later when the 18th amendment was passed. We don't have the money (since money is the thing that keeps government rolling and is a form of speech [yeah right]), but we do have a lot of people and that's a lot of votes and money right there.

    ReplyDelete